Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (Feb 2024)

Anatomical three‐dimensional model with peri‐implant defect for in vitro assessment of dental implant decontamination

  • Sadia Nazir Khan,
  • Odd Carsten Koldsland,
  • Hanna Tiainen,
  • Carl Hjortsjö

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.841
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objectives Access to the implant surface plays a significant role in effective mechanical biofilm removal in peri‐implantitis treatment. Mechanical decontamination may also alter the surface topography of the implant, potentially increasing susceptibility to bacterial recolonization. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate a newly developed, anatomically realistic, and adaptable three‐dimensional (3D)printed model with a peri‐implant bone defect to evaluate the accessibility and changes of dental implant surfaces after mechanical decontamination treatment. Material and Methods A split model of an advanced peri‐implant bone defect was prepared using 3D printing. The function of the model was tested by mechanical decontamination of the exposed surface of dental implants (Standard Implant Straumann AG) coated with a thin layer of colored occlusion spray. Two different instruments for mechanical decontamination were used. Following decontamination, the implants were removed from the split model and photographed. Image analysis and fluorescence spectroscopy were used to quantify the remaining occlusion spray both in terms of area and total amount, while scanning electron microscopy and optical profilometry were used to analyze alteration in the implant surface morphology. Results The 3D model allowed easy placement and removal of the dental implants without disturbing the implant surfaces. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of removal of the occlusion spray revealed differences in the mechanism of action and access to the implant surface between tested instruments. The model permitted surface topography analysis following the decontamination procedure. Conclusion The developed 3D model allowed a realistic simulation of decontamination of implant surfaces with colored occlusion spray in an advanced peri‐implant defect. 3D printing allows easy adaptation of the model in terms of the shape and location of the defect. The model presents a valuable tool for in vitro investigation of the accessibility and changes of the implant surface after mechanical and chemical decontamination.

Keywords