Brain Stimulation (May 2024)

TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites

  • Ethan A. Solomon,
  • Jeffrey B. Wang,
  • Hiroyuki Oya,
  • Matthew A. Howard,
  • Nicholas T. Trapp,
  • Brandt D. Uitermarkt,
  • Aaron D. Boes,
  • Corey J. Keller

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 3
pp. 698 – 712

Abstract

Read online

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is believed to alter ongoing neural activity and cause circuit-level changes in brain function. While the electrophysiological effects of TMS have been extensively studied with scalp electroencephalography (EEG), this approach generally evaluates low-frequency neural activity at the cortical surface. However, TMS can be safely used in patients with intracranial electrodes (iEEG), allowing for direct assessment of deeper and more localized oscillatory responses across the frequency spectrum. Objective/Hypothesis: Our study used iEEG to understand the effects of TMS on human neural activity in the spectral domain. We asked (1) which brain regions respond to cortically-targeted TMS, and in what frequency bands, (2) whether deeper brain structures exhibit oscillatory responses, and (3) whether the neural responses to TMS reflect evoked versus induced oscillations. Methods: We recruited 17 neurosurgical patients with indwelling electrodes and recorded neural activity while patients underwent repeated trials of single-pulse TMS at either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or parietal cortex. iEEG signals were analyzed using spectral methods to understand the oscillatory responses to TMS. Results: Stimulation to DLPFC drove widespread low-frequency increases (3–8 Hz) in frontolimbic cortices and high-frequency decreases (30–110 Hz) in frontotemporal areas, including the hippocampus. Stimulation to parietal cortex specifically provoked low-frequency responses in the medial temporal lobe. While most low-frequency activity was consistent with phase-locked evoked responses, anterior frontal regions exhibited induced theta oscillations following DLPFC stimulation. Conclusions: By combining TMS with intracranial EEG recordings, our results suggest that TMS is an effective means to perturb oscillatory neural activity in brain-wide networks, including deeper structures not directly accessed by stimulation itself.

Keywords