Romanian Neurosurgery (Dec 2017)
Clinical diagnosis versus autopsy diagnosis in head trauma
Abstract
The correct and complete diagnosis is essential for the adequate care and the favourable clinical evolution of the patients with head trauma. Purpose: To identify the error rate in the clinical diagnosis of head injuries as shown in comparison with the autopsy diagnosis and to identify the most common sources of error. Material and method: We performed a retrospective study based on data from the medical files and the autopsy reports of patients with head trauma who died in the hospital and underwent forensic autopsy. We collected: demographic data, clinical and laboratory data and autopsy findings. To quantify the concordance rate between the clinical diagnosis of death and the autopsy diagnosis we used a 4 classes classification, which ranged from 100% concordance (C1) to total discordance (C4) and two classes of partial discordance: C2 (partial discordance in favour of the clinical diagnosis- missing injuries in the autopsy reports) and C3 (partial discordance in favor of the necroptic diagnosis- missing injuries in the medical files). Data were analyzed with SPSS version 20.0. Results: We analyzed 194 cases of death due to head injuries. We found a total concordance between the clinical death diagnosis and autopsy diagnosis in 30.4% of cases and at least one discrepancy in 69.6% of cases. Increasing the duration of hospitalization directly correlates with the amount of the imaging investigations and these in turn correlates with an increased rate of diagnosis concordance. Among the patients with stage 3 coma who associated a spinal cord injury, we found a partial diagnosis discordance in 50% of cases and a total discordance in 50% of cases, possibly due to the need for conducting emergency imaging investigation and the need for surgical treatment. In cases with partial and total discordant diagnosis, at least one lesion was omitted in 45.1% of the cases. The most commonly omitted injuries in C2 cases were subdural hematoma, intracerebral hematoma and ventricular hemorrhage (21.6%). In C3 cases the most frequently omitted injuries were subarachnoidian hemorrhage and skull base fractures (17.9%). Conclusions: The clinical cause of death is not always concordant with the autopsy diagnosis. Autopsy may identify the inconsistencies in diagnosis, the injuries frequently skipped and the factors favoring the discordance rate between the clinical death diagnosis and the autopsy diagnosis, making it a valuable tool for improving the clinical care of the patients with head trauma.
