PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

Think leader, think White? Capturing and weakening an implicit pro-White leadership bias.

  • Seval Gündemir,
  • Astrid C Homan,
  • Carsten K W de Dreu,
  • Mark van Vugt

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083915
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
p. e83915

Abstract

Read online

Across four studies, we found evidence for an implicit pro-White leadership bias that helps explain the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in leadership positions. Both White-majority and ethnic minority participants reacted significantly faster when ethnically White names and leadership roles (e.g., manager; Study 1) or leadership traits (e.g., decisiveness; Study 2 & 3) were paired in an Implicit Association Test (IAT) rather than when ethnic minority names and leadership traits were paired. Moreover, the implicit pro-White leadership bias showed discriminant validity with the conventional implicit bias measures (Study 3). Importantly, results showed that the pro-White leadership bias can be weakened when situational cues increase the salience of a dual identity (Study 4). This, in turn, can diminish the explicit pro-White bias in promotion related decision making processes (Study 4). This research offers a new tool to measure the implicit psychological processes underlying the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in leadership positions and proposes interventions to weaken such biases.