PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Masks, money, and mandates: A national survey on efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccination intentions in the United States.

  • Rikki H Sargent,
  • Shaelyn Laurie,
  • Leah Moncada,
  • Leo F Weakland,
  • James V Lavery,
  • Daniel A Salmon,
  • Walter A Orenstein,
  • Robert F Breiman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267154
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 4
p. e0267154

Abstract

Read online

Various efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates have been employed in the United States. We sought to rapidly investigate public reactions to these efforts to increase vaccination, including self-reported responses to widespread reduced masking behavior, monetary incentive programs to get vaccinated, and work vaccination requirements. Using a unique method for data collection (Random Domain Intercept Technology), we captured a large (N = 14,152), broad-based sample of the United States Web-using population (data collected from June 30 -July 26, 2021). About 3/4 of respondents reported being vaccinated. The likelihood of vaccination and vaccination intention differed across various demographic indicators (e.g., gender, age, income, political leaning). We observed mixed reactions to efforts aimed at increasing vaccination rates among unvaccinated respondents. While some reported that specific efforts would increase their likelihood of getting vaccinated (between 16% and 32%), others reported that efforts would decrease their likelihood of getting vaccinated (between 17% and 42%). Reactions differed by general vaccination intention, as well as other demographic indicators (e.g., race, education). Our results highlight the need to fully understand reactions to policy changes, programs, and mandates before they are communicated to the public and employed. Moreover, the results emphasize the importance of understanding how reactions differ across groups, as this information can assist in targeting intervention efforts and minimizing potentially differential negative impact.