Remote Sensing (Dec 2023)

Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Resolution ICESat-2 Canopy Height Data: A Case Study of the Taranaki Region

  • Feng Chen,
  • Xuqing Zhang,
  • Longyu Wang,
  • Bing Du,
  • Songya Dang,
  • Linwei Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245686
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 24
p. 5686

Abstract

Read online

Forest canopy height data are essential to assessing forest biomass and carbon storage, and they can be efficiently retrieved using the Advanced Terrain Laser Altimetry System (ATLAS) onboard ICESat-2. However, due to the sparse and discrete distribution of ATLAS footprints, the wall-to-wall mapping of forest canopy heights requires a combination of other ancillary data. In order to match the ATLAS data with ancillary data, or estimate higher-resolution canopy heights, the standard ATLAS canopy height products (ATL08), reported at a fixed step size of 100 m (12 m × 100 m), are typically divided into 30 m step sizes. There is little concern about the accuracy of the generated 30 m segment (12 m × 30 m) dataset. Furthermore, previous studies have primarily evaluated the along-track performance of the canopy height product, rather than the ability of ATLAS to provide an accurate representation of canopy heights at the pixel-wise level. In this study, we use airborne LiDAR data as references with which to evaluate the along-track accuracy of 30 m segment canopy height products and their accuracy in representing canopy height at the pixel-wise level. A framework method for spatially matching ATLAS canopy height estimate data with ancillary data accurately is also established in this study. This enables the use of ATLAS data to characterize pixel-wise canopy heights more precisely. The results show that the accuracy of the 30 m segment version dataset in representing the pixel-wise canopy heights (R2 = 0.38, RMSE = 8.37 m) is lower than its along-track accuracy (R2 = 0.44, RMSE = 7.63 m). Using only the nighttime data for the Taranaki region, the proposed method improves the estimation of pixel-wise forest canopy heights, with the R2 increasing from 0.49 to 0.59, the RMSE decreasing from 7.48 m to 5.51 m, and the %RMSE decreasing from 36.7% to 27.6%. This study contributes to understanding the accuracy of the ATLAS in reflecting pixel-wise canopy height and provides a new way of spatially matching ATLAS canopy height data with other remote sensing data.

Keywords