Less risk of patellofemoral degeneration without significant clinical and survivorship difference for distal tibial tuberosity high tibial osteotomy compared to biplanar high tibial osteotomy over a mid-term follow-up

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to compare the mid-term radiographic, clinical results and survivorship between distal tibial tuberosity high tibial osteotomy (DTT-HTO) and conventional biplanar medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (cOW-HTO). Methods The weight-bearing line ratio (WBL%) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were evaluated using a standing anteroposterior view of lower extremity. The posterior tibial slope (PTS), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), tilting angle (TT) and lateral shift ratio (LSR) were evaluated using the lateral views and Merchant views. The Knee Society (KS) knee and function score, Lysholm score, and Anterior Knee Pain Scale (Kujala score) were were used to evaluate the functional outcomes. All parameters were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up. The postoperative complications and survivorship for both groups were also evaluated during the follow-up period. Results The WBL% and MPTA exhibited no significant differences between the two groups preoperatively and at the final follow-up. The postoperative CDI and TT in the cOW group decreased significantly compared with the DTT group ( p = .037 and .041, respectively). The PF grade showed a significant increase after DTT-HTO and cOW-HTO ( p = .036 and <0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the postoperative PF grade of cOW group was significantly higher than that of DTT group ( p = .039). The KS knee and function score, Lysholm score, and Kujala score for both groups improved similarly at the final follow-up. The survivorship free of revision was 92.7 % in the DTT group and 94.2% in the OW group. Conclusions Despite observing a lower risk of PF joint progression in DTT-HTO compared to cOW-HTO, the clinical outcomes and survivorship after DTT-HTO and cOWHTO were comparable over a mid-term follow-up.