PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator.

  • Paula Monasor Denia,
  • María Del Carmen Castellet García,
  • Carla Manjón García,
  • Juan David Quirós Higueras,
  • Noelia de Marco Blancas,
  • Jorge Bonaque Alandí,
  • Xavier Jordi Juan Senabre,
  • Agustín Santos Serra,
  • Juan López-Tarjuelo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213253
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 3
p. e0213253

Abstract

Read online

1. background & purposeInvestigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) detectors and radiochromic film. We also included a later correction of output factors (OFs) recommended by the recently published IAEA´s code of practice TRS 483 on dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy.2. materials & methodsThe OFs, profiles, and PDDs of 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams were measured with 11 different detectors using field sizes between 0.6 × 0.6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2.3. resultsThe OFs of the FFF beams were lower than those of the FF beams for field sizes larger than 3 × 3 cm2 but higher for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2. After applying the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections, the final OFs were compatible with our initial results when considering uncertainties involved. Small-volume detectors are preferable for measuring the penumbra of these small fields where this attribute is higher in the crossline direction than in the inline direction. The R100 of equivalent-quality FFF beams was higher compared to the corresponding flattened beams.4. conclusionsWe observed no difference for the dose responses between 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams for any of the detectors. OF results, profiles and PDDs were clearly consistent with the previously published literature regarding the Versa HD linac. Correcting our first OFs, taken as ratio of detector charges, with the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections to obtain the final OFs, did not make the former significantly different.