Gut and Liver (Nov 2022)

Endoscopist-Driven Sedation Practices in South Korea: Re-evaluation Considering the Nationwide Survey in 2019

  • Seon-Young Park,
  • Jun Kyu Lee,
  • Chang-Hwan Park,
  • Byung-Wook Kim,
  • Chang Kyun Lee,
  • Hong Jun Park,
  • Byung Ik Jang,
  • Dong Uk Kim,
  • Jin Myung Park,
  • Jae Min Lee,
  • Young Sin Cho,
  • Hyung Ku Chon,
  • Seung Young Seo,
  • Woo Hyun Paik,
  • the Committees of Quality Management and Conscious Sedation of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl210466
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 6
pp. 899 – 906

Abstract

Read online

Background/Aims: This study aimed to determine changes in endoscopist-driven sedation practices 5 years after the first nationwide survey in 2014 by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE). Methods: A 59-item survey covering current practices was electronically mailed to all members of the KSGE in 2019. Results: In total, 955 (12.8%) out of 7,486 questionnaires were returned. A total of 738 (77.7%) out of 955 respondents attended dedicated sedation education programs. The American Society of Anesthesiologists class was recorded by 464 (51.2%) out of 907 respondents. The recording rate was higher in respondents who completed sedation education (p=0.014) and worked in general or tertiary hospitals (p<0.001). Compared to that reported in the previous survey, the reported use of propofol was higher in 2019. The respondents had higher satisfaction scores for propofol-based sedation compared with midazolam monotherapy (p<0.001). The rates of oxygen supplementation (p<0.001) and oxygen saturation level monitoring (p<0.001) during sedative endoscopy were higher in 2019 than in the previous survey. A total of 876 (98.4%) out of 890 respondents reported a separate recovery bay, and 615 (70.5%) out of 872 respondents reported that personnel were assigned solely to the recovery bay. Conclusions: Endoscopist-driven sedation and monitoring practices in 2019 were significantly different than those in 2014. The respondents favored propofol-based sedation and utilized oxygen supplementation and monitoring of O2 saturation more frequently in 2019 than in 2014.

Keywords