Italian Journal of Animal Science (Jan 2010)

The measurement of chest girth as an alternative to weight determination in the performance recording of meat sheep

  • Francesco Panella,
  • Debora Bogani,
  • Lorenzo Castelli,
  • Francesca Maria Sarti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2003.123
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 2
pp. 123 – 129

Abstract

Read online

The aim of this study was to assess, for two Italian meat sheep breeds (Appenninica and Merinizzata italiana), the relationshipbetween an easily recorded measurement (girth of chest) and the character used for selection purposes (weight),and to define the most appropriate mathematical methods to infer the second from the first.For the Appenninica 1392 lambs were measured, for the Merinizzata italiana 1559 lambs were measured. The possibilityof estimating weight through chest girth (CG) measurement was evaluated, separately for each breed, by taking themost suitable model between those including different kinds of regression effect. The model was chosen in relation to thevalue of the determination coefficient and the sum of square residuals. The prediction accuracy of the model was assessedby comparing the expected values with the observed ones through a number of statistical tests.A further prediction analysis was carried out using the mean values of the observed weights that fell in each 1 cm classof girth, in order to reduce the error derived by the varying numbers of observations per unit of chest girth.The model including the square regression nested within the sex effect and the flock random effect nested within the sexeffect was observed to be the most suitable one to predict the weight from the chest girth; the determination coefficientsranged between 0.944 (Appenninica) and 0.955 (Merinizzata). The prediction parameters were: -10.458+ 0.241 (CG) +0.004 (CG2) for the Appenninica males; -6.121 + 0.093 (CG) + 0.005 (CG2) for the Appenninica females; -6.325 + 0.189(CG) + 0.004 (CG2) for the Merinizzata males; -4.676 + 0.078 (CG) + 0.005 (CG2) for the Merinizzata females. The correlationbetween the observed and expected values was always higher than 0.97. The equations estimated using themean weights for each girth showed extremely high determination coefficients (˜ = 0.99) due to the reduction of variabilityimplied by this method. Choosing between the equations calculated on the entire data set or on the mean weightswill only be possible after a period of field tests.

Keywords