Drones (Mar 2024)

Estimating Total Length of Partially Submerged Crocodylians from Drone Imagery

  • Clément Aubert,
  • Gilles Le Moguédec,
  • Alvaro Velasco,
  • Xander Combrink,
  • Jeffrey W. Lang,
  • Phoebe Griffith,
  • Gualberto Pacheco-Sierra,
  • Etiam Pérez,
  • Pierre Charruau,
  • Francisco Villamarín,
  • Igor J. Roberto,
  • Boris Marioni,
  • Joseph E. Colbert,
  • Asghar Mobaraki,
  • Allan R. Woodward,
  • Ruchira Somaweera,
  • Marisa Tellez,
  • Matthew Brien,
  • Matthew H. Shirley

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8030115
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 3
p. 115

Abstract

Read online

Understanding the demographic structure is vital for wildlife research and conservation. For crocodylians, accurately estimating total length and demographic class usually necessitates close observation or capture, often of partially immersed individuals, leading to potential imprecision and risk. Drone technology offers a bias-free, safer alternative for classification. We evaluated the effectiveness of drone photos combined with head length allometric relationships to estimate total length, and propose a standardized method for drone-based crocodylian demographic classification. We evaluated error sources related to drone flight parameters using standardized targets. An allometric framework correlating head to total length for 17 crocodylian species was developed, incorporating confidence intervals to account for imprecision sources (e.g., allometric accuracy, head inclination, observer bias, terrain variability). This method was applied to wild crocodylians through drone photography. Target measurements from drone imagery, across various resolutions and sizes, were consistent with their actual dimensions. Terrain effects were less impactful than Ground-Sample Distance (GSD) errors from photogrammetric software. The allometric framework predicted lengths within ≃11–18% accuracy across species, with natural allometric variation among individuals explaining much of this range. Compared to traditional methods that can be subjective and risky, our drone-based approach is objective, efficient, fast, cheap, non-invasive, and safe. Nonetheless, further refinements are needed to extend survey times and better include smaller size classes.

Keywords