PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

Effectiveness of guided and unguided low-intensity internet interventions for adult alcohol misuse: a meta-analysis.

  • Heleen Riper,
  • Matthijs Blankers,
  • Hana Hadiwijaya,
  • John Cunningham,
  • Stella Clarke,
  • Reinout Wiers,
  • David Ebert,
  • Pim Cuijpers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099912
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 6
p. e99912

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundAlcohol misuse ranks within the top ten health conditions with the highest global burden of disease. Low-intensity, Internet interventions for curbing adult alcohol misuse have been shown effective. Few meta-analyses have been carried out, however, and they have involved small numbers of studies, lacked indicators of drinking within low risk guidelines, and examined the effectiveness of unguided self-help only. We therefore conducted a more thorough meta-analysis that included both guided and unguided interventions.MethodsSystematic literature searches were performed up to September 2013. Primary outcome was the mean level of alcohol consumption and drinking within low risk guidelines for alcohol consumption at post-treatment.FindingsWe selected 16 randomised controlled trials (with 23 comparisons and 5,612 participants) for inclusion. Results, showed a small but significant overall effect size in favour of Internet interventions (g = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.13-0.27, pConclusionsInternet interventions are effective in reducing adult alcohol consumption and inducing alcohol users to adhere to guidelines for low-risk drinking. This effect is small but from a public health point of view this may warrant large scale implementation at low cost of Internet interventions for adult alcohol misuse. Moderator analyses with sufficient power are, however, needed in order to assess the robustness of these overall results and to assess whether these interventions may impact on subgroups with different levels of success.