Colposcopy Accuracy and Diagnostic Performance: A Quality Control and Quality Assurance Survey in Italian Tertiary-Level Teaching and Academic Institutions—The Italian Society of Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology (SICPCV)
Massimo Origoni,
Francesco Cantatore,
Francesco Sopracordevole,
Nicolò Clemente,
Arsenio Spinillo,
Barbara Gardella,
Rosa De Vincenzo,
Caterina Ricci,
Fabio Landoni,
Maria Letizia Di Meo,
Andrea Ciavattini,
Jacopo Di Giuseppe,
Eleonora Preti,
Anna Daniela Iacobone,
Carmine Carriero,
Miriam Dellino,
Massimo Capodanno,
Antonino Perino,
Cesare Miglioli,
Luca Insolia,
Maggiorino Barbero,
Massimo Candiani
Affiliations
Massimo Origoni
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita Salute San Raffaele University School of Medicine, 20132 Milan, Italy
Francesco Cantatore
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita Salute San Raffaele University School of Medicine, 20132 Milan, Italy
Francesco Sopracordevole
Gynecological Oncology Unit, IRCCS Oncological Referral Center (CRO), National Cancer Institute, 33081 Aviano, Italy
Nicolò Clemente
Gynecological Oncology Unit, IRCCS Oncological Referral Center (CRO), National Cancer Institute, 33081 Aviano, Italy
Arsenio Spinillo
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
Barbara Gardella
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
Rosa De Vincenzo
Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, IRCCS Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy
Caterina Ricci
Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy
Fabio Landoni
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
Maria Letizia Di Meo
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
Andrea Ciavattini
Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatological and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, 60123 Ancona, Italy
Jacopo Di Giuseppe
Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatological and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, 60123 Ancona, Italy
Eleonora Preti
Preventive Gynecology Unit, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology (IEO), 20141 Milan, Italy
Anna Daniela Iacobone
Preventive Gynecology Unit, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology (IEO), 20141 Milan, Italy
Carmine Carriero
Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy
Miriam Dellino
Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy
Massimo Capodanno
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Napoli, 80138 Naples, Italy
Antonino Perino
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy
Cesare Miglioli
Research Center for Statistics, University of Geneva, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland
Luca Insolia
Research Center for Statistics, University of Geneva, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland
Maggiorino Barbero
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti, 14100 Asti, Italy
Massimo Candiani
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita Salute San Raffaele University School of Medicine, 20132 Milan, Italy
Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) principles are essential for effective cervical cancer prevention. Being a crucial diagnostic step, colposcopy’s sensitivity and specificity improvements are strongly advocated worldwide since inter- and intra-observer differences are the main limiting factors. The objective of the present study was the evaluation of colposcopy accuracy through the results of a QC/QA assessment from a survey in Italian tertiary-level academic and teaching hospitals. A web-based, user-friendly platform based on 100 colposcopic digital images was forwarded to colposcopists with different levels of experience. Seventy-three participants were asked to identify colposcopic patterns, provide personal impressions, and indicate the correct clinical practice. The data were correlated with a panel of experts’ evaluation and with the clinical/pathological data of the cases. Overall sensitivity and specificity with the threshold of CIN2+ accounted for 73.7% and 87.7%, respectively, with minor differences between senior and junior candidates. Identification and interpretation of colposcopic patterns showed full agreement with the experts’ panel, ranging from 50% to 82%, in some instances with better results from junior colposcopists. Colposcopic impressions correlated with a 20% underestimation of CIN2+ lesions, with no differences linked to level of experience. Our results demonstrate the good diagnostic performance of colposcopy and the need for improving accuracy through QC assessments and adhesion to standard requirements and recommendations.