In this study, the seismic responses of moment-resisting steel frames (MRSFs) with welded and post-tensioned connections under 28 artificial seismic sequences (mainshock–aftershock) are compared. For this aim, the mainshock are scaled at different ground motion intensity levels as a function of the spectral pseudo-acceleration corresponding to the fundamental period of vibration of the structure Sa(T1), whereas different intensity levels of the aftershocks are used for a percentage of the peak maximum acceleration of the mainshock. The seismic performance comparison of both structural systems is computed for the maximum, residual inter-story drift and hysteretic energy demands. The results show that post-tensioned frames significantly reduce the structural demands, especially in the case of residual inter-story drifts and hysteretic energy in comparison with moment-resisting steel frames with welded connections. The reductions in the structural response tend to be larger as the intensity of the aftershock tends to increase. Therefore, it is concluded that the use of post-tensioned connections is a great alternative to mitigate the seismic response of buildings subjected to seismic sequences.
