Frontiers in Immunology (Apr 2022)

Differences in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Response Dynamics Between Class-I- and Class-II-Specific T-Cell Receptors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

  • Alexander M. Xu,
  • Dalin Li,
  • Joseph E. Ebinger,
  • Emebet Mengesha,
  • Rebecca Elyanow,
  • Rachel M. Gittelman,
  • Heidi Chapman,
  • Sandy Joung,
  • Gregory J. Botwin,
  • Valeriya Pozdnyakova,
  • Philip Debbas,
  • Angela Mujukian,
  • John C. Prostko,
  • Edwin C. Frias,
  • James L. Stewart,
  • Arash A. Horizon,
  • Noah Merin,
  • Kimia Sobhani,
  • Jane C. Figueiredo,
  • Susan Cheng,
  • Ian M. Kaplan,
  • Dermot P. B. McGovern,
  • Akil Merchant,
  • Gil Y. Melmed,
  • Jonathan Braun,
  • Jonathan Braun

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.880190
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

T-cells specifically bind antigens to induce adaptive immune responses using highly specific molecular recognition, and a diverse T-cell repertoire with expansion of antigen-specific clones can indicate robust immune responses after infection or vaccination. For patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a spectrum of chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases usually requiring immunomodulatory treatment, the T-cell response has not been well characterized. Understanding the patient factors that result in strong vaccination responses is critical to guiding vaccination schedules and identifying mechanisms of T-cell responses in IBD and other immune-mediated conditions. Here we used T-cell receptor sequencing to show that T-cell responses in an IBD cohort were influenced by demographic and immune factors, relative to a control cohort of health care workers (HCWs). Subjects were sampled at the time of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and longitudinally afterwards; TCR Vβ gene repertoires were sequenced and analyzed for COVID-19-specific clones. We observed significant differences in the overall strength of the T-cell response by age and vaccine type. We further stratified the T-cell response into Class-I- and Class-II-specific responses, showing that Ad26.COV2.S vector vaccine induced Class-I-biased T-cell responses, whereas mRNA vaccine types led to different responses, with mRNA-1273 vaccine inducing a more Class-I-deficient T-cell response compared to BNT162b2. Finally, we showed that these T-cell patterns were consistent with antibody levels from the same patients. Our results account for the surprising success of vaccination in nominally immuno-compromised IBD patients, while suggesting that a subset of IBD patients prone to deficiencies in T-cell response may warrant enhanced booster protocols.

Keywords