JGH Open (Sep 2023)

Low‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel versus standard‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A randomized Phase II trial

  • Ken Kamata,
  • Hajime Imai,
  • Hisakazu Matsumoto,
  • Yukitaka Yamashita,
  • Takao Kato,
  • Katsuhisa Nishi,
  • Shunsuke Omoto,
  • Kosuke Minaga,
  • Kentaro Yamao,
  • Tomoko Hyodo,
  • Sung‐Woon Im,
  • Akane Hara,
  • Tomoe Yoshikawa,
  • Rei Ishikawa,
  • Ayana Okamoto,
  • Tomohiro Yamazaki,
  • Atsushi Nakai,
  • Kazuomi Ueshima,
  • Yasutaka Chiba,
  • Mamoru Takenaka,
  • Tomohiro Watanabe,
  • Masayuki Kitano,
  • Masatoshi Kudo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12966
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 9
pp. 659 – 666

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and Aim A multicenter, open‐label randomized Phase II trial was conducted to determine whether low‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel (GnP) could improve tolerability and show equivalent efficacy to the standard‐dose GnP for elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with metastatic pancreatic cancer who presented at one of four Japanese referral centers between November 2016 and January 2021 were enrolled. The 60 patients were randomly assigned to low‐ or standard‐dose groups with a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the low‐dose GnP group received gemcitabine at a dose of 250 mg/m2 and nab‐paclitaxel at 125 mg/m2. Results Low‐dose GnP significantly decreased the rate of cases requiring dose reduction (16.7% vs 63.3%). The response rate (36.7% vs 33.3%) and progression‐free survival (7.3 vs 8 months) were comparable between the low‐ and standard‐dose groups as determined by independent review. The difference in the median overall survival between the two groups was not significant (7.9 vs 12 months). The proportion of patients with hematologic and non‐hematologic treatment‐related adverse events was comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Low‐dose GnP had an equivalent efficacy to conventional therapy; however, it did not reduce adverse events.

Keywords