Journal of Integrative Agriculture (Jan 2025)

Aerated irrigation increases tomato production by improving soil nitrogen availability

  • Chuandong Tan,
  • Yadan Du,
  • Xiaobo Gu,
  • Wenquan Niu,
  • Jinbo Zhang,
  • Christoph Müller,
  • Xuesong Cao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.04.004
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 322 – 338

Abstract

Read online

Soil nitrogen (N) is the main limiting nutrient for plant growth, which is sensitive to variations in the soil oxygen environment. To provide insights into plant N accumulation and yield under aerated and drip irrigation, a greenhouse tomato experiment was conducted with six treatments, including three fertilization types: inorganic fertilizer (NPK); organic fertilizer (OM); chemical (75% of applied N)+organic fertilizer (25%) (NPK+OM) under drip irrigation (DI) and aerated irrigation (AI) methods. Under AI, total soil carbon mineralization (Cmin) was significantly higher (by 5.7–7.0%) than under DI irrigation. Cmin in the fertilizer treatments followed the order NPK+OM>OM>NPK under both AI and DI. Potentially mineralizable C (C0) and N (N0) was greater under AI than under DI. Gross N mineralization, gross nitrification, and NH4+ immobilization rates were significantly higher under the AINPK treatment than the DINPK treatment by 2.58–3.27-, 1.25–1.44-, and 1–1.26-fold, respectively. These findings demonstrated that AI and the addition of organic fertilizer accelerated the turnover of soil organic matter and N transformation processes, thereby enhancing N availability. Moreover, the combination of AI and organic fertilizer application was found to promote root growth (8.4–10.6%), increase the duration of the period of rapid N accumulation (ΔT), and increase the maximum N accumulation rate (Vmax), subsequently encouraging aboveground dry matter accumulation. Consequently, the AI treatment yield was significantly greater (by 6.3–12.4%) than under the DI treatment. Further, N partial factor productivity (NPFP) and N harvest index (NHI) were greater under AI than under DI, by 6.3 to 12.4%, and 4.6 to 8.1%, respectively. The rankings of yield and NPFP remained consistent, with NPK+OM>OM>NPK under both AI and DI treatments. These results highlighted the positive impacts of AI and organic fertilizer application on soil N availability, N uptake, and overall crop yield in tomato. The optimal management measure was identified as the AINPK+OM treatment, which led to more efficient N management, better crop growth, higher yield, and more sustainable agricultural practices.

Keywords