Research Involvement and Engagement (Apr 2021)

Using the United Kingdom standards for public involvement to evaluate the impact of public involvement in a multinational clinical study

  • Kathy Seddon,
  • Jim Elliott,
  • Miriam Johnson,
  • Clare White,
  • Max Watson,
  • Annmarie Nelson,
  • Simon Noble

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00264-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Plain English summary The past decade has seen a genuine increase in patient and public involvement (PI) in clinical research, far beyond a symbolic presence on a trial management committee or inclusion on a grant application. The United Kingdom (UK) Standards for Public Involvement provide a useful structure to support PI throughout a study as well as defining a benchmark that can be used to improve the involvement of patients and the public in studies. The importance of reflecting on and reporting on PI in specific studies has been recognised since it contributes to a stepwise change process which will eventually lead to PI becoming normal practice for clinical research. A recent review identified a myriad of frameworks by which PI may be evaluated, risking an inconsistent approach to PI evaluation and consequently slowing down its progression. The Hospice Inpatient Deep vein thrombosis Detection study (HIDDen) was a national multicentre study to explore the prevalence and associated variables of blood clots in patients with advanced cancer when they were admitted to the specialist palliative care unit. In this paper we will be considering the HIDDen research in terms of the UK Standards for Public Involvement.

Keywords