PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis detection in different regions with different endemic burden: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Shiying Li,
  • Bin Liu,
  • Mingli Peng,
  • Min Chen,
  • Wenwei Yin,
  • Hui Tang,
  • Yuxuan Luo,
  • Peng Hu,
  • Hong Ren

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180725
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7
p. e0180725

Abstract

Read online

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out.Up to June 20, 2015, multiple databases were screened for relevant studies.Accordingly, 106 studies included 52,410 samples were selected. Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for TB detection was validated against either culture or a composite reference standard (CRS). Additionally, selected studies were further subgrouped in four groups based on sample's type, subject's age, status of HIV co-infection and smear-positivity. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.88) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.98), respectively, compared to culture; while it was 0.59 (95% CI 0.44-0.72) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00) compared to CRS. The overall sensitivity was lower in countries with high TB prevalence than countries with middle/low prevalence (0.84, 95% CI: 0.80-0.88 versus 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93). Furthermore, Xpert MTB/RIF has higher sensitivity in patients with positive smears (0.99, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), in patients with pulmonary TB samples (0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.90), in adults (0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.86) and in HIV-positive patients (0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.87).Taken together, Xpert MTB/RIF is a quick and accurate diagnostic assay for TB which will significantly help the physicians to make their clinical decisions.