Heliyon (Mar 2024)

Approaches for boosting self-confidence of clinical nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Elahe Ramezanzade Tabriz,
  • Masoumeh Sadeghi,
  • Ensieh Tavana,
  • Hamid Heidarian Miri,
  • Fatemeh Heshmati Nabavi

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 6
p. e27347

Abstract

Read online

Background: Self-confidence is a key element in successfully promoting achievement strivings among the healthcare workforce. Targeted interventions can strengthen this characteristic in nursing students, thus improving the quality of hospital services. Objectives: We evaluated the effect of educational interventions on boosting self-confidence in nursing students using systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive search was used to screen the related studies in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Peer-reviewed literature in English until June 2023 was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were controlled trials, either non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) or randomized (RCTs). Studies were assessed for methodological quality by the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Cochrane ''Risk of Bias'' tool for RCTs (RoB 2.0) and quality assessment tool for before-after (pre-post) studies with no control group. The main outcome was the self-confidence score of nursing students because of educational methods or intervention/s. Using the inverse variance weights method, a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) estimate with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess conceptual heterogeneity using Stata. Results: Twenty-two studies were selected involving 1758 participants and 940 cases of nursing students in the intervention group on boosting self-confidence (Fourteen Randomized controlled trials, Five Quasi-experimental, and three Before-After studies). The post-intervention self-confidence results in the nursing student's intervention group were significantly greater (SMD) (SMD for Controlled experimental design = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.14–0.89), (SMD for Quasi-experimental = 0.04; 95% CI = −0.33-0.41), (SMD for Before-After (Pre-Post) = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.85–3.63). The random-effect meta-analysis of 22 interventional studies determined that educational interventions are significantly associated with the improving self-confidence of nursing students. The intervention showed a moderate impact on the research units, according to Cohen's d results. Also, the results of simulation learning intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.03–0.81) showed a significant relationship between intervention and outcome in studies. Conclusions: Analysis of our findings revealed the successful impact of most interventional approaches in boosting self-confidence, especially in the long term. It can be concluded that self-confidence is a multifactorial concept that can be improved by using targeted combination intervention strategies.

Keywords