Frontiers in Oncology (Jul 2021)

Development of a Machine Learning Classifier Based on Radiomic Features Extracted From Post-Contrast 3D T1-Weighted MR Images to Distinguish Glioblastoma From Solitary Brain Metastasis

  • Alix de Causans,
  • Alix de Causans,
  • Alix de Causans,
  • Alexandre Carré,
  • Alexandre Carré,
  • Alexandre Roux,
  • Alexandre Roux,
  • Alexandre Roux,
  • Arnault Tauziède-Espariat,
  • Arnault Tauziède-Espariat,
  • Arnault Tauziède-Espariat,
  • Samy Ammari,
  • Samy Ammari,
  • Edouard Dezamis,
  • Edouard Dezamis,
  • Edouard Dezamis,
  • Frederic Dhermain,
  • Frederic Dhermain,
  • Sylvain Reuzé,
  • Sylvain Reuzé,
  • Eric Deutsch,
  • Eric Deutsch,
  • Catherine Oppenheim,
  • Catherine Oppenheim,
  • Catherine Oppenheim,
  • Pascale Varlet,
  • Johan Pallud,
  • Johan Pallud,
  • Johan Pallud,
  • Myriam Edjlali,
  • Myriam Edjlali,
  • Myriam Edjlali,
  • Charlotte Robert,
  • Charlotte Robert

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.638262
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesTo differentiate Glioblastomas (GBM) and Brain Metastases (BM) using a radiomic features-based Machine Learning (ML) classifier trained from post-contrast three-dimensional T1-weighted (post-contrast 3DT1) MR imaging, and compare its performance in medical diagnosis versus human experts, on a testing cohort.MethodsWe enrolled 143 patients (71 GBM and 72 BM) in a retrospective bicentric study from January 2010 to May 2019 to train the classifier. Post-contrast 3DT1 MR images were performed on a 3-Tesla MR unit and 100 radiomic features were extracted. Selection and optimization of the Machine Learning (ML) classifier was performed using a nested cross-validation. Sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated as performance metrics. The model final performance was cross-validated, then evaluated on a test set of 37 patients, and compared to human blind reading using a McNemar’s test.ResultsThe ML classifier had a mean [95% confidence interval] sensitivity of 85% [77; 94], a specificity of 87% [78; 97], a balanced accuracy of 86% [80; 92], and an AUC of 92% [87; 97] with cross-validation. Sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy and AUC were equal to 75, 86, 80 and 85% on the test set. Sphericity 3D radiomic index highlighted the highest coefficient in the logistic regression model. There were no statistical significant differences observed between the performance of the classifier and the experts’ blinded examination.ConclusionsThe proposed diagnostic support system based on radiomic features extracted from post-contrast 3DT1 MR images helps in differentiating solitary BM from GBM with high diagnosis performance and generalizability.

Keywords