Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research (Jun 2021)
The Need for Alternatives to Liver Biopsies: Non-Invasive Analytics and Diagnostics
Abstract
James Neuberger,1 Owen Cain2 1Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK; 2Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UKCorrespondence: James NeubergerLiver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UKTel +44 7827299254Email [email protected]: Histology remains essential for the diagnosis and management of many disorders affecting the liver. However, the biopsy procedure itself is associated with a low risk of harm to the patient and cost to the health services; samples may not be adequate and are subject to sampling variation. Furthermore, interpretation often depends on the skill of the pathologist. Increasingly, new techniques are becoming available that are altering the indications for liver biopsy. Many diseases of the liver can be diagnosed and managed using serological and radiological techniques; the degree of fibrosis and fat can often be assessed by serological or imaging techniques and the nature of space occupying lesions defined by serology, imaging and use of liquid biopsy. However, these techniques, too, are subject to limitations: sensitivity and specificity is not always adequate for diagnosis or management; some techniques are expensive and often also require expert interpretation. Although there may be less need for liver biopsy today, histology remains the gold standard as well as an essential tool for the diagnosis and management of many conditions, especially where there are multiple pathologies, or where a diagnosis cannot or has not been made by alternative approaches. Until less invasive techniques become more reliable and accessible, liver histology will remain a key investigation.Keywords: imaging, liquid biopsies, multiple liver pathology, unknown pathology, non-invasive tests
