Neurospine (Sep 2023)

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Assessment of Pedicle Screw Accuracy in Clinical Utilization of a New Robotic System in Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Study

  • Byeong-Jin Ha,
  • Jong-Min Lee,
  • Seon-Jin Yoon,
  • Byung-Kwan Kim,
  • Junseok Lee,
  • Suhun Lee,
  • Seungjae Ryu,
  • Yongyeob Cha,
  • Sungteac Hwang,
  • Donggi Woo,
  • Chang Kyu Lee,
  • Dong Ah Shin,
  • Yoon Ha,
  • Sung Uk Kuh,
  • Keung Nyun Kim,
  • Dongwuk Son,
  • Seong Yi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346552.276
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 3
pp. 1028 – 1039

Abstract

Read online

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in patients undergoing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with robotic guidance, using a newly developed 3-dimensional quantitative measurement system. The study also aimed to assess the clinical feasibility of the robotic system in the field of spinal surgery. Methods A total of 113 patients underwent pedicle screw insertion using the CUVIS-spine pedicle screw guide system (CUREXO Inc.). Intraoperative O-arm images were obtained, and screw insertion pathways were planned accordingly. Image registration was performed using paired-point registration and iterative closest point methods. The accuracy of the robotic-guided pedicle screw insertion was assessed using 3-dimensional offset calculation and the Gertzbein-Robbins system (GRS). Results A total of 448 screws were inserted in the 113 patients. The image registration success rate was 95.16%. The average error of entry offset was 2.86 mm, target offset was 2.48 mm, depth offset was 1.99 mm, and angular offset was 3.07°. According to the GRS grading system, 88.39% of the screws were classified as grade A, 9.60% as grade B, 1.56% as grade C, 0.22% as grade D, and 0.22% as grade E. Clinically acceptable screws (GRS grade A or B) accounted for 97.54% of the total, with no reported neurologic complications. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that pedicle screw insertion using the novel robot-assisted navigation method is both accurate and safe. Further prospective studies are necessary to explore the potential benefits of this robot-assisted technique in comparison to conventional approaches.

Keywords