Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (Mar 2023)

Dynamics of the December 2020 Ash‐Poor Plume Formed by Lava‐Water Interaction at the Summit of Kīlauea Volcano, Hawaiʻi

  • Ryan C. Cahalan,
  • Larry G. Mastin,
  • Alexa R. VanEaton,
  • Shaul Hurwitz,
  • Adam B. Smith,
  • Josef Dufek,
  • Stephen A. Solovitz,
  • Matt Patrick,
  • Johanne Schmith,
  • Carolyn Parcheta,
  • Weston A. Thelen,
  • Drew T. Downs

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010718
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 3
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract On 20 December 2020, after more than 2 years of quiescence at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawaiʻi, renewed volcanic activity in the summit crater caused boiling of the water lake over a period of ∼90 min. The resulting water‐rich, electrified plume rose to 11–13 km above sea level, which is among the highest plumes on record for Kīlauea. Although conventional models would infer a high mass flux from explosive magma‐water interaction, the plume was not associated with an infrasound signal indicative of “explosive” activity, nor did it produce a measurable ash‐fall deposit. We use multisensor data to characterize lava‐water interaction and plume generation during this opening phase of the 2020–21 eruption. Satellite, weather radar, and eyewitness observations revealed that the plume was rich in water vapor and hydrometeors but transported less ash than expected from its maximum height. Volcanic lightning flashes detected by ground‐based cameras were confined to freezing altitudes of the upper cloud, suggesting that the ice formation drove the electrification of this plume. The low acoustic energy from lava‐water interaction points to a weakly explosive style of hydrovolcanism. Heat transfer calculations show that the lava to water heat flux was sufficient to boil the lake within 90 min. Limited mixing of lava and water inhibited major steam explosions and fine fragmentation. Results from one‐dimensional plume modeling suggest that the models may underpredict plume height due to overestimation of crosswind air‐entrainment. Our findings shed light on an unusual style of volcanism in which weakly explosive lava‐water interaction generated an outsized plume.

Keywords