Journal of Clinical Medicine (Apr 2024)

Validation of the Novel Web-Based Application HUMTELEMED for a Comprehensive Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Based on the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines

  • Matteo Landolfo,
  • Francesco Spannella,
  • Alessandro Gezzi,
  • Federico Giulietti,
  • Lucia Sabbatini,
  • Isabella Bari,
  • Romina Alessandroni,
  • Angelica Di Agostini,
  • Paolo Turri,
  • Francesco Alborino,
  • Lorenzo Scoppolini Massini,
  • Riccardo Sarzani

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082295
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 8
p. 2295

Abstract

Read online

Background and aims: SCORE2/SCORE2-OP cardiovascular risk (CVR) charts and online calculators do not apply to patients with comorbidities, target organ damage, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, for whom the assessment relies on the conventional consultation of the 2021 ESC guidelines (qualitative approach). To simplify the CVR evaluation, we developed an integrated multi-language and free-to-use web application. This study assessed the agreement between the conventional method versus our web app. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 1306 consecutive patients aged 40+ years referred to our center for the diagnosis and management of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Two double-blind operators performed the CVR assessment and classified each patient into low–moderate-, high-, and very-high-risk categories by using the conventional method (SCORE2/SCORE2-OP charts and consultation of the 2021 ESC guidelines) and the web app. The Kappa statistics were used to compare the two methods. Results: The mean age was 60.3 ± 11.9 years, with male prevalence (51.4%). Patients in primary prevention were 77.0%. According to the SCORE2/SCORE2-OP charts and 2021 ESC guideline consultation, the CVR was low–moderate in 18.6% (n° 243), high in 36.8% (n° 480), and very high in 44.6% (n° 583). According to the web app, individual CVR was low–moderate in 19.5% (n° 255), high in 35.4% (n° 462), and very high in 45.1% (n° 589). The two methods strongly agreed (Kappa = 0.960, p Conclusions: our application has excellent reliability in a broad “real life” population and may help non-expert users and busy clinicians to assess individual CVR appropriately, representing a free-to-use, simple, time-sparing and widely available alternative to the conventional CVR evaluation using SCORE2/SCORE2-OP and 2021 ESC guideline charts.

Keywords