Cancer Imaging (Mar 2023)

Intraoperative MRI-derived volumetric ablation margins and initial correlation with local outcome after MRI-guided cryoablation of renal tumors

  • Nienke S. de Jager,
  • Tim J. van Oostenbrugge,
  • Torben Pätz,
  • Sjoerd F. M. Jenniskens,
  • Jurgen J. Fütterer,
  • Johan F. Langenhuijsen,
  • Christiaan G. Overduin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00546-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose To assess volumetric ablation margins derived from intraoperative pre- and post-ablation MRI after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors and explore its correlation with local treatment success. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on 30 patients (mean age 69y) who underwent percutaneous MRI-guided cryoablation between May 2014 and May 2020 for 32 renal tumors (size: 1.6–5.1 cm). Tumor and ice-ball volumes were segmented on intraprocedural pre- and post-ablation MR images using Software Assistant for Interventional Radiology (SAFIR) software. After MRI-MRI co-registration, the software automatically quantified the minimal treatment margin (MTM),defined as the smallest 3D distance between the tumor and ice-ball surface. Local tumor progression (LTP) after cryoablation was assessed on follow-up imaging. Results Median follow-up was 16 months (range: 1–58). Local control after cryoablation was achieved in 26 cases (81%) while LTP occurred in 6 (19%). The intended MTM of ≥5 mm was achieved in 3/32 (9%) cases. Median MTM was significantly smaller for cases with (− 7 mm; IQR:-10 to − 5) vs. without LTP (3 mm; IQR:2 to 4) (P 3 cm. Conclusions Determination of volumetric ablation margins from intraoperative MRI was feasible and may be useful in predicting local outcome after MRI-guided renal cryoablation. In our preliminary data, an intraoperative MRI-derived minimal margin extending at least 1 mm beyond the MRI-visible tumor led to local control and this was more difficult to achieve in tumors > 3 cm. Ultimately, online margin analysis may be a valuable tool to intraoperatively assess therapy success, but larger prospective studies are needed to establish a reliable threshold for clinical use.

Keywords