Cardiovascular Ultrasound (Mar 2009)

Left atrial volume measurement with automated border detection by 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

  • Harmann Leanne,
  • Migrino Raymond Q,
  • Artang Ramin,
  • Bowers Mark,
  • Woods Timothy D

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-16
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
p. 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective Left atrial size is an important marker for adverse cardiovascular events. There is general consensus that left atrial volume index (LAVI) is the best measurement of size. The current LAVI measurement techniques are laborious. Semi-automated measurement with a 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) system may be a practical clinical alternative to measure LAVI, but it has not been adequately evaluated against Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) gold standard. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of a commercially available 3D algorithm for measurement of LAVI against LAVI obtained from MRI and Area Length Method (ALM). Design In 27 consecutive subjects referred for cardiac MRI (age 54 ± 13 years, 63% male), LAVI was measured using 3 imaging modalities: 3DE, ALM, MRI and the results were correlated. ALM was measured using standard American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. The time required to measure LAVI by 3DE and ALM were compared. Results There was a significant correlation in systolic and diastolic LA volumes and left atrial ejection fraction between 3DE and MRI (r = 0.86 for systole, r = 0.76 for diastole, r = 0.88 for ejection fraction, P P P Conclusion Three-dimensional echocardiography with semiautomatic border detection is a practical alternative for obtaining the left atrial volume in a time-efficient manner compared to the current standard.