Diagnostics (Feb 2021)

Two-Dimensional Aortic Size Normalcy: A Novelty Detection Approach

  • Paolo Frasconi,
  • Daniele Baracchi,
  • Betti Giusti,
  • Ada Kura,
  • Gaia Spaziani,
  • Antonella Cherubini,
  • Silvia Favilli,
  • Andrea Di Lenarda,
  • Guglielmina Pepe,
  • Stefano Nistri

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020220
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 2
p. 220

Abstract

Read online

Background: To develop a tool for assessing normalcy of the thoracic aorta (TA) by echocardiography, based on either a linear regression model (Z-score), or a machine learning technique, namely one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM) (Q-score). Methods: TA diameters were measured in 1112 prospectively enrolled healthy subjects, aging 5 to 89 years. Considering sex, age and body surface area we developed two calculators based on the traditional Z-score and the novel Q-score. The calculators were compared in 198 adults with TA > 40 mm, and in 466 patients affected by either Marfan syndrome or bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Results: Q-score attained a better Area Under the Curve (0.989; 95% CI 0.984–0.993, sensitivity = 97.5%, specificity = 95.4%) than Z-score (0.955; 95% CI 0.942–0.967, sensitivity = 81.3%, specificity = 93.3%; p 40 mm. The prevalence of TA dilatation in Marfan and BAV patients was higher as Z-score > 2 than as Q-score p Conclusions: Q-score is a novel tool for assessing TA normalcy based on a model requiring less assumptions about the distribution of the relevant variables. Notably, diameters do not need to depend linearly on anthropometric measurements. Additionally, Q-score can capture the joint distribution of these variables with all four diameters simultaneously, thus accounting for the overall aortic shape. This approach results in a lower rate of predicted TA abnormalcy in patients at risk of TA aneurysm. Further prognostic studies will be necessary for assessing the relative effectiveness of Q-score versus Z-score.

Keywords