Cancer Medicine (Mar 2023)

A population‐based study of factors associated with systemic treatment in advanced prostate cancer decedents

  • Jennifer Leigh,
  • Danial Qureshi,
  • Ewa Sucha,
  • Roshanak Mahdavi,
  • Igal Kushnir,
  • Luke T. Lavallée,
  • Dominick Bosse,
  • Colleen Webber,
  • Peter Tanuseputro,
  • Michael Ong

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5401
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5
pp. 5569 – 5579

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Life‐prolonging therapies (LPTs) are rapidly evolving for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, although factors associated with real‐world uptake are not well characterized. Methods In this cohort of prostate‐cancer decedents, we analyzed factors associated with LPT access. Population‐level databases from Ontario, Canada identified patients 65 years or older with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy and who died of prostate cancer between 2013 and 2017. Univariate and multivariable analyses assessed the association between baseline characteristics and receipt of LPT in the 2 years prior to death. Results Of 3575 patients who died of prostate cancer, 40.4% (n = 1443) received LPT, which comprised abiraterone (66.3%), docetaxel (50.3%), enzalutamide (17.2%), radium‐223 (10.0%), and/or cabazitaxel (3.5%). Use of LPT increased by year of death (2013: 22.7%, 2014: 31.8%, 2015: 41.8%, 2016: 49.1%, and 2017: 57.9%, p < 0.0001), driven by uptake of all agents except docetaxel. Adjusted odds of use were higher for patients seen at Regional Cancer Centers (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5–2.1) and who received prior prostate‐directed therapy (OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0–1.5), but lower with advanced age (≥85: OR: 0.54, 95% CI:0.39–0.75), increased chronic conditions (≥6: OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43–0.92), and long‐term care residency (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17–0.89). Income, stage at presentation, and distance to the cancer center were not associated with LPT uptake. Conclusion In this cohort of prostate cancer‐decedents, real‐world uptake of novel prostate cancer therapies occurred at substantially higher rates for patients receiving care at Regional Cancer Centers, reinforcing the potential benefits for treatment access for patients referred to specialist centers.

Keywords