Parasite (Jan 2023)

Review of the concept of Profilicollis Meyer, 1931 with a description of Profilicollis rancoensis n. sp. (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) from the freshwater crab, Aegla abtao Schmitt, 1942 (Decapoda: Anomura) in Chile, with a key to congeneric species

  • Amin Omar M.,
  • Rodríguez Sara M.,
  • Farrer Solinus,
  • Fierro Pablo,
  • Garcés Cristóbal,
  • Rivera Felipe,
  • D’Elía Guillermo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2023042
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30
p. 42

Abstract

Read online

Profilicollis rancoensis n. sp. is the tenth species of Profilicollis Meyer, 1931 which includes 9 other species mostly known from marine decapod crabs and shore birds. Cystacanths of P. rancoensis are described from the dominant freshwater crab Aegla abtao in Ranco Lake, Chile and are morphologically distinguished from cystacanths of the 9 other species based on a combination of 4 characters. These are body size, number of proboscis hook rows, number of hooks per row, and length of the largest anterior 2–4 hooks. Male and female cystacanths of P. rancoensis are 2.10–3.33 mm long having an ovoid proboscis with 14 rows of 6–7 hooks per row, with the largest anterior 2–4 hooks being 105–110 micrometers long; the anterior trunk has many small spines in 70–80 concentric rings, each with 50–60 spines around them; hook roots are simple, directed posteriorly, about as long as the blades anteriorly with unremarkable anterior manubria; the cephalic ganglion are in mid-receptacle just anterior to the level of the anterior trunk; the lemnisci are long and slender; the testes are in the anterior trunk, posterior trunk, or one in each; the primordia of 2 tubular cement glands are evident; strong bundles of fibers link the anterior and posterior trunk; and the posterior trunk has a corrugated surface cuticula. Molecular analysis (COI and 18S) sequences coincided with the morphology and support its taxonomy. The phylogenetic profile revealed that P. rancoensis n. sp. fell into the Profilicollis clade. Both sequences showed low genetic variation, and three different haplotypes were found. The new species was more closely related to P. botulus (Van Cleave, 1916) Witenberg, 1932 than to other Profilicollis species.

Keywords