PLoS ONE (Jan 2012)

A clinical prediction score in addition to WHO criteria for anti-retroviral treatment failure in resource-limited settings--experience from Lesotho.

  • Niklaus Daniel Labhardt,
  • Thabo Lejone,
  • Matse'liso Setoko,
  • Matalenyane Poka,
  • Jochen Ehmer,
  • Karolin Pfeiffer,
  • Patrice Zinga Kiuvu,
  • Lutgarde Lynen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047937
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 10
p. e47937

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of a clinical score for viral failure among patients fulfilling the WHO-criteria for anti-retroviral treatment (ART) failure in rural Lesotho.MethodsPatients fulfilling clinical and/or immunological WHO failure-criteria were enrolled. The score includes the following predictors: Prior ART exposure (1 point), CD4-count below baseline (1), 25% and 50% drop from peak CD4-count (1 and 2), hemoglobin drop≥1 g/dL (1), CD4 countResultsAmong 1'131 patients on ART ≥ 6 months, 134 (11.8%) had immunological and/or clinical failure, 104 (78%) had blood drawn (13 died, 10 lost to follow-up, 7 did not show up). From 92 (88%) a result could be obtained (2 samples hemolysed, 10 lost). Out of these 92 patients 47 (51%) had viral failure (≥ 5000 copies), 27 (29%) viral suppression (40 copies (95%CI: 84-100), and of 90% to detect a VL ≥ 5000 copies (70-97). Within the score, adherenceConclusionA score ≥ 5 among patients fulfilling WHO-criteria had a PPV of 100% for a detectable VL and 90% for viral failure. In settings without regular access to VL-testing, this PPV may be considered high enough to switch this patient-group to second-line treatment without confirmatory VL-test.