A multicenter retrospective study on comparing the efficacy and safety of the therapy of intermittent cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids versus rituximab for primary membranous nephropathy

Abstract

Background Few clinical studies compare the long-term remission, relapse, and safety of rituximab (RTX) or a combination of intermittent intravenous infusion of cyclophosphamide (CTX) and oral corticosteroid for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) patients.Methods We collected multicenter retrospective data on PMN patients with nephrotic syndrome who received RTX or intermittent intravenous CTX with oral corticosteroids between 1 January 2019 and 31 January 2024. Patients were followed up until two years after receiving immunotherapy. The primary outcomes were a composite of complete or partial remission rates at 6, 12, and 24 months. The secondary outcomes were the relapse and safety evaluation.Results Forty patients treated with RTX and 27 with the CTX regime were available for analysis. No significant difference in the remission rate at 6, 12, or 24 months was observed between the two groups (p > .05). Kaplan–Meier’s survival analysis showed that the relapse-free cumulative survival rate of the RTX group was superior to that of the CTX group (p = .023). Compared with baseline, both the media of urine protein and serum albumin levels in the two groups showed a significant improvement at 6 months and maintained through to the second year. No significant difference in the occurrence of total side effects between the two groups (p = .160).Conclusions There was no difference in remission rates and safety between RTX versus intermittent intravenous CTX combined with oral corticosteroid treatment for patients with PMN within 2 years. RTX appeared to have benefits in terms of prolonging relapse-free survival.

Keywords

• Primary membranous nephropathy
• rituximab
• cyclophosphamide
• remission
• relapse
• safety evaluation