Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (Sep 2022)

Mesenchymal stem cells augmentation for surgical procedures in patients with symptomatic chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review

  • Migliorini Filippo,
  • Mangiavini Laura,
  • Giorgino Riccardo,
  • Vismara Valeria,
  • Jörg Eschweiler,
  • Nicola Maffulli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03311-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety profile of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) augmentation in chondral procedures are controversial. This systematic review updated the current evidence on MSCs augmentation for chondral procedures in patients with symptomatic chondral defects of the knee. Methods This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was updated in August 2022. Two independent authors accessed PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Scopus. No additional filters or time constrains were used for the search. A cross reference of the bibliographies was also performed. All the clinical studies investigating surgical procedures for chondral defects of the knee augmented with MSCs were accessed. Defects of both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints were included. The following patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were retrieved at baseline and last follow-up: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), Tegner Activity Scale, Lysholm Knee Scoring System, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC). Return to daily activities and data on hypertrophy, failure, revision surgery were also collected. Failures were defined as the recurrence of symptoms attributable to the index procedure. Revisions were defined as any reoperation at the site of the index procedure. Results A total of 15 clinical studies (411 procedures) were included. Patients returned to their prior sport activity at 2.8 ± 0.4 months. All the PROMs improved at last follow-up: Tegner (P = 0.0002), Lysholm (P < 0.0001), the IKDC (P < 0.0001), VAS (P < 0.0001). At a mean of 30.1 ± 13.9 months, 3.1% (2 of 65 patients) reported graft hypertrophy, 3.2% (2 of 63) were considered failures. No surgical revision procedures were reported. Given the lack of available quantitative data for inclusion, a formal comparison of surgical procedures was not conducted. Conclusion MSCs augmentation in selected chondral procedures could be effective, with a low rate of complications. Further investigations are required to overcome the current limitations to allow the clinical translation of MSCs in regenerative medicine.

Keywords