Energies (Jun 2020)

An Evaluation of Energy Storage Cost and Performance Characteristics

  • Kendall Mongird,
  • Vilayanur Viswanathan,
  • Patrick Balducci,
  • Jan Alam,
  • Vanshika Fotedar,
  • Vladimir Koritarov,
  • Boualem Hadjerioua

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133307
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 13
p. 3307

Abstract

Read online

The energy storage industry has expanded globally as costs continue to fall and opportunities in consumer, transportation, and grid applications are defined. As the rapid evolution of the industry continues, it has become increasingly important to understand how varying technologies compare in terms of cost and performance. This paper defines and evaluates cost and performance parameters of six battery energy storage technologies (BESS)—lithium-ion batteries, lead-acid batteries, redox flow batteries, sodium-sulfur batteries, sodium-metal halide batteries, and zinc-hybrid cathode batteries—four non-BESS storage systems—pumped storage hydropower, flywheels, compressed air energy storage, and ultracapacitors—and combustion turbines. Cost and performance information was compiled based on an extensive literature review, conversations with vendors and stakeholders, and costs of systems procured at sites across the United States. Detailed cost and performance estimates are presented for 2018 and projected out to 2025. Annualized costs were also calculated for each technology.

Keywords