LISAH, Univ Montpellier, AgroParisTech, INRAE, IRD, L’Institut Agro, Montpellier, France; Correspondence to: Laboratory of soil-agrosystem-hydrosystem interaction (LISAH), 2 place Pierre Viala, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Léa Courteille
LISAH, Univ Montpellier, AgroParisTech, INRAE, IRD, L’Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
Dominique Arrouays
INRAE, Info&Sols, 45075 Orléans, France
Lucas De Carvalho Gomes
Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Viborg, Denmark
Jérôme Cortet
CEFE, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
Rachel E. Creamer
Soil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Einar Eberhardt
Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Germany
Mogens H. Greve
Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Viborg, Denmark
Erik Grüneberg
Thünen Institute of Forest Ecology, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
Roland Harhoff
Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Germany
Gerard B.M. Heuvelink
Soil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands; ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Ina Krahl
Soil state and soil monitoring, German Environment Agency (UBA), Dessau-Rosslau, Germany
Philippe Lagacherie
LISAH, Univ Montpellier, AgroParisTech, INRAE, IRD, L’Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
Ladislav Miko
Institute for Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Vera L. Mulder
Soil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
László Pásztor
Institute for Soil Sciences, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Silvia Pieper
Soil state and soil monitoring, German Environment Agency (UBA), Dessau-Rosslau, Germany
Anne C. Richer-de-Forges
INRAE, Info&Sols, 45075 Orléans, France
Antonio Rafael Sánchez-Rodríguez
Department of Agronomy, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
David Rossiter
ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Section of Soil & Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Bastian Steinhoff-Knopp
Coordination Unit Climate Soil Biodiversity, Thünen-Institute, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
Stefanie Stöckhardt
Soil state and soil monitoring, German Environment Agency (UBA), Dessau-Rosslau, Germany
Gábor Szatmári
Institute for Soil Sciences, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Katalin Takács
Institute for Soil Sciences, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Maria Tsiafouli
Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Tom Vanwalleghem
Department of Agronomy, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
Nicole Wellbrock
Thünen–Institut für Waldökosysteme (WO), Eberswalde, Germany
Johanna Wetterlind
Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Skara, Sweden
In 2023, the European Commission released a legislative proposal for a Directive on Soil Monitoring and Resilience which aims to define a legal framework to achieve healthy soils across the European Union (EU) by 2050. A key component of the initial Directive is the mandate for Member States to establish basic geographic soil governance units, referred to as soil districts, and appoint a district-specific authority to oversee the implementation of soil health assessments. This paper proposes an operational definition of the districts following the conditions outlined in the proposal for the Directive and discusses various attention points for their implementation. Tentative districts were developed for seven EU countries, considering soil type, climate, topography, and land cover factors, starting from the smallest existing administrative unit (i.e. municipalities). Experts were asked to report on the applicability of the proposed districts within well-known pedo-ecological regions and discuss the relevance of the districts for establishing an EU-wide monitoring network and reporting on soil health and degradation. The outcomes highlight the need for detailed soil maps to account for specific soil types when stratifying countries into soil districts. The soilscape approach allows for a consistent method to defining soil districts across Member States. This enables contrasting soils within a district to be managed in a similar manner, with soil degradation/health thresholds applied to each district based on land cover. However, it is unclear whether soil districts as currently formulated in the Directive are in fact the right tool to support local soil management and monitoring of soil health. Districts can help ensure that all soil conditions are covered in a monitoring system, but they may not provide support for soil management or monitoring at a local scale due to short-scale soil variability and threats affecting soil management within the same soilscape. Beyond the use of districts for designing a European/national scale monitoring system, the districts can help create animations and other educational tools to promote soil literacy and connectivity of users to soils locally.