Frontiers in Pharmacology (May 2021)

Pemetrexed-Platinum With or Without Bevacizumab for Chinese Chemo-Naive Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Real-World Study

  • Xin Li,
  • Jie Huang,
  • Yao Qiu,
  • Qianyun Zhang,
  • Shaoyu Yang,
  • Kan Wu,
  • Jiaoli Wang,
  • Limin Wang,
  • Jian Ye,
  • Shenglin Ma,
  • Shenglin Ma,
  • Bing Xia,
  • Xueqin Chen,
  • Xueqin Chen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.649222
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Despite recent advances in the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), bevacizumab plus platinum–based doublet chemotherapy remains a commonly used first-line regimen. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed–platinum with or without bevacizumab in Chinese chemo-naive advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in a real-world setting. We retrospectively collected 100 patients who received pemetrexed–platinum with or without bevacizumab (PP, n = 46; Bev+PP, n = 54) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical characteristics of patients were balanced, except for the proportion of stage IV b+c (Bev+PP and PP: 67.4 vs. 37.0%, p = 0.0066). Bev+PP significantly improved the objective response rate (ORR, 65 vs. 30%, p = 0.0004) and progression-free survival (PFS, 7.4 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.009), but not overall survival (OS, 17.5 vs. 15.0 months, p = 0.553) compared with PP. Treatment (p = 0.001), gender (p = 0.008), adrenal metastasis (p = 0.001), and liver metastasis (p = 0.013) were independent risk factors for PFS. Patients with adrenal metastasis tended to be at the highest risk of not benefiting from bevacizumab addition (HR [95% CI]: 2.244 [0.6495–7.753]). The safety profile was acceptable, and grade ≥3 toxicity occurred similarly. This study showed that pemetrexed–platinum plus bevacizumab was effective compared to chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.

Keywords