Invertebrate composition in submerged macrophyte debris: habitat and degradation time effects

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if the rate of degradation and the habitat type associated with two submersed macrophytes affect the structure of the invertebrate communities in a shallow subtropical lake. We evaluated debris decomposition rate with a litter bags approach, assigned to four treatments: Potamogeton pectinatus decomposing inside their own stand (PP) and inside a Chara zeylanica stand (PC), and C. zeylanica decomposing inside their own stand (CC) and inside a P. pectinatus stand (CP). During the degradation experiment (20 days), we evaluated the fauna associated both with debris and at live macrophytes. The debris were washed, dried and the coefficient of degradation was determined. We estimated the richness and abundance of taxa of associated invertebrates, and they were classified into functional feeding groups. We evaluated preference of invertebrate communities comparing fauna at live macrophytes and their debris. We observed differences in mass loss between the treatments. Chara zeylanica showed a mass loss four times faster than P. pectinatus. The highest invertebrate abundance occurred in treatment PP and highest invertebrate richness in treatments CC and PP. Collectors and predators showed the highest abundances. The PP treatment had the greatest number of collectors and PC an equitable distribution of all functional groups. Five taxa showed preference for P. pectinatus debris instead of C. zeylanica or P. pectinatus alive, and debris of charophyte was preferred by six taxa instead of alive plant, and by two taxa when the debris were incubated in the stand of P. pectinatus. Our study demonstrated the interference of the incubation site on the decomposition coefficient and on the structuring of the invertebrate communities, and that the abundance of invertebrate at detritus is mainly due to abundance at live plants. Also, the absence of shredders suggests the use of debris mainly as shelter instead of food resource. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.18.28.1.0.462