Minerals (Jul 2024)

Clarification of Distinguishing Natural Super-Reduced Phase from Synthetics Based on Inclusions

  • Yutong Ma,
  • Mengqi Miao,
  • Ming Chen,
  • Shan Qin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070722
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 7
p. 722

Abstract

Read online

Super-reduced phases (SRPs), such as silicon carbide (SiC) and metal silicides, have increasingly been reported in various geological environments. However, their origin remains controversial. SRP inclusions (e.g., metal silicides and metallic silicon (Si0)) within SiC are commonly believed to indicate a natural origin. Here, we identified an unusual SRP assemblage (SiC, (Fe,Ni)Si2, and Si0) in situ in an H5-type Jingshan ordinary chondrite. Simultaneously, our analysis showed that the SiC abrasives contain (Fe,Ni)Si2 and Si0 inclusions. Other inclusions in the artificial SiC were similar to those in natural SiC (moissanite) reported in reference data, including diverse metal silicides (e.g., FeSi, FeSi2, Fe3Si7, and Fe5Si3), as well as a light rare earth element-enriched SiO phase and Fe-Mn-Cr alloys. These inclusions were produced by the in situ reduction of silica and the interaction between Si-containing coke and hot metals during the synthesis of the SiC abrasives. The results demonstrate that the SRP assemblage in the Jingshan chondrite originates from abrasive contamination and that the SRP inclusions (with a low content of Ca, Al, Ti, and Zr) cannot be used as a conclusive indicator for natural SiC. Additionally, the morphologies, biaxiality, and polytypes (determined by Raman spectroscopy) of SiC abrasives bear resemblance to those reported for natural SiC, and caution must be exercised when identifying the origin of SRP in samples processed by conventional methods using SiC abrasives. At the end of this paper, we propose more direct and reliable methods for distinguishing between natural and synthetic SiC.

Keywords