Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (Jun 2025)

Letter of Concern from the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine Regarding ACGME Proposed Changes

  • Richard J. Hamilton,
  • Lance B. Becker,
  • Richard E. Wolfe,
  • D. Adam Algren,
  • Thomas Arnold,
  • Michael Baumann,
  • Ross P. Berkeley,
  • Terrell S. Caffery,
  • Chad M. Cannon,
  • Theodore J. Corbin,
  • Michael E. Chansky,
  • Harinder S. Dhindsa,
  • Charles L. Emerman,
  • David A. Farcy,
  • Chris Fox,
  • Michael A. Gibbs,
  • Christopher S. Goode,
  • Steven “Andy” Godwin,
  • Dietrich Jehle,
  • David Johnson,
  • Samuel M. Keim,
  • Babak Khazaeni,
  • Barry J. Knapp,
  • Clint Hawthorne,
  • John D. Hoyle Jr.,
  • Michael Christopher Kurz,
  • Evan Leibner,
  • Robert McNamara,
  • Robert F. McCormack,
  • Edward A. Michelson,
  • Chadwick Miller,
  • Ashley Norse,
  • Andrew Nugent,
  • Brian J. O’Neil,
  • David T. Overton,
  • Edward A. Panacek,
  • William F. Paolo,
  • Denis R. Pauzé,
  • Amanda L. Perez,
  • Ralph J. Riviello,
  • Scott W. Rodi,
  • Peter S. Pang,
  • Juan A. Gonzalez Sanchez,
  • David Seaberg,
  • Adam Schwartz,
  • Stephen A. Shiver,
  • David P. Sklar,
  • Ben C. Smith,
  • Jeffrey R. Stowell,
  • Marc D. Squillante,
  • J. Jeremy Thomas,
  • Terry Vanden Hoek,
  • Gregory A. Volturo,
  • E. Lea Walters,
  • Thomas E. Wyatt,
  • Donald M. Yealy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.48840
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. 4
pp. 769 – 772

Abstract

Read online

This letter, signed by over 50 academic chairs of emergency medicine, urges the ACGME to reconsider a proposed mandate requiring all emergency medicine residency programs to adopt a four-year training model. The authors argue that current three-year programs are supported by data demonstrating equivalent educational and clinical outcomes compared to four-year formats. They criticize the flawed survey methodology underpinning the proposal, note the loss of milestone-based training flexibility, and highlight the lack of added scholarly or clinical value in the fourth year. The letter also outlines negative consequences for fellowship participation, workforce development, trainee debt, and diversity. The signatories advocate for maintaining the current flexible training model to preserve excellence, equity, and innovation in emergency medicine education.