Towards construction of embankment on soft soil: a comparative study of lightweight materials and deep replacement techniques

Abstract

Abstract Planning embankments demands comprehensive studies to select suitable materials, enhance soil stability, ensure optimal performance, and comply with building code requirements and sustainability standards. This study offers an evaluation of various alternatives and their effectiveness for constructing embankments on weak soil using the 2D finite element software Plaxis 8. It highlights the convergence of different techniques, offering flexibility in selecting the optimal strategy for projects. The behaviour of multilayer clayey soil under an embankment of lightweight filling materials such as mixed sawdust or geo-foam and that carrying an embankment of traditional fill material improved by deep replacement techniques like concrete piles (CP), deep-mixing columns (DMC), stone columns (SC), and sand piles (SP) were compared considering factors like stress distribution, pore water pressure, and settlement of the soil. The results demonstrate that lightweight materials reduced settlement by 11–98% and stress by 5–89%, while deep replacement techniques reduced settlement by 8.5–75% and stress by 44–88%. Notably, the study underscores the effectiveness of DMC in promoting soil reuse compared to CP.

Keywords

• Embankment
• Lightweight
• Soft clay
• Sand pile
• Stone column
• Deep mixing