Embolization alone is as effective as TACE for unresectable HCC: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was recommended as first line therapy for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) has not been widely recognized. This work was to determine whether TAE was as effective and safe as TACE for unresectable HCC. Methods We performed a systematic search of electronic databases and other sources for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing TAE with TACE for unresectable HCC. Results were expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) for survival and Odds Ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes using RevMan 5.4.1. Results We included 6 trials with 683 patients. The risk of bias of included RCTs was from unclear to high risk. There were no significant differences between TACE and TAE for progression-free survival (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.45–1.55; p = 0.57), overall survival (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90–1.35; p = 0.36), and objective response rate (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80–1.71; p = 0.42) without obvious publication bias. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. TAE group reported similar or less adverse effects than TACE group in all the studies. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that TAE was as effective as TACE. Since TAE was simpler, cheaper and had less adverse effects than TACE, TAE should be a better choice in most cases where TACE was indicated for unresectable HCC.

Keywords

• Hepatocellular carcinoma
• Transarterial chemoembolization
• Transarterial embolization
• Meta-analysis