Royal Society Open Science (Jan 2024)

Still little evidence sex differences in spatial navigation are evolutionary adaptations

  • Connor M. Hults,
  • Richard C. Francis,
  • Edward K. Clint,
  • Winter Smith,
  • Elliott R. Sober,
  • Theodore Garland,
  • Justin S. Rhodes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231532
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

A putative male advantage in wayfinding ability is the most widely documented sex difference in human cognition and has also been observed in other animals. The common interpretation, the sex-specific adaptation hypothesis, posits that this male advantage evolved as an adaptive response to sex differences in home range size. A previous study a decade ago tested this hypothesis by comparing sex differences in home range size and spatial ability among 11 species and found no relationship. However, the study was limited by the small sample size, the lack of species with a larger female home range and the lack of non-Western human data. The present study represents an update that addresses all of these limitations, including data from 10 more species and from human subsistence cultures. Consistent with the previous result, we found little evidence that sex differences in spatial navigation and home range size are related. We conclude that sex differences in spatial ability are more likely due to experiential factors and/or unselected biological side effects, rather than functional outcomes of natural selection.

Keywords