Journal of Intensive Care (Feb 2019)

A simplified definition of diastolic function in sepsis, compared against standard definitions

  • Michael J. Lanspa,
  • Troy D. Olsen,
  • Emily L. Wilson,
  • Mary Louise Leguyader,
  • Eliotte L. Hirshberg,
  • Jeffrey L. Anderson,
  • Samuel M. Brown,
  • Colin K. Grissom

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0367-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Guidelines for grading diastolic dysfunction poorly categorize septic patients. We compared how well the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 2009 and 2016 definitions and a simplified definition categorized septic patients. Methods We studied septic patients who received a transthoracic echocardiogram within 24 h of admission to an ICU. We categorized patients according to ASE 2009 and 2016 definitions and a definition using E/e’, a surrogate for left ventricular filling pressure. We assessed 28-day all-cause mortality and the presence of pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, or myocardial infarction. We tested for associations among diastolic grade, comorbidities, and outcomes using logistic regression. Results We studied 398 patients. Mortality was 23%. The simplified definition categorized more patients than ASE 2016 (78% vs. 71%, p = 0.035); both definitions categorized more patients than ASE 2009 (34%, p 9 and 7% had a severely abnormal E/e′ > 13. Conclusions The ASE 2016 definition categorizes more septic patients than the ASE 2009 definition, but it does not categorize the diastolic function of a third of septic patients. ASE 2016 designates many patients with elevated E/e′ as normal. A simplified definition categorized patients with less ambiguity and is associated with relevant comorbidities.

Keywords