Brain and Spine (Jan 2025)

Diagnostic and prognostic performance of urine ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 across multiple acute brain injury types – A longitudinal prospective cohort study

  • Santtu Hellström,
  • Antti Sajanti,
  • Aditya Jhaveri,
  • Abhinav Srinath,
  • Carolyn Bennett,
  • Ying Cao,
  • Fredrika Koskimäki,
  • Johannes Falter,
  • Janek Frantzén,
  • Seán B. Lyne,
  • Tomi Rantamäki,
  • Riikka Takala,
  • Jussi P. Posti,
  • Susanna Roine,
  • Sulo Kolehmainen,
  • Miro Jänkälä,
  • Jukka Puolitaival,
  • Romuald Girard,
  • Melissa Rahi,
  • Jaakko Rinne,
  • Eero Castrén,
  • Janne Koskimäki

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5
p. 104173

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) is recognized as a diagnostic and prognostic blood biomarker for traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to evaluate whether UCH-L1 concentrations measured in patients' urine post-injury could serve as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for outcomes in various types of acute brain injuries (ABI). Material and methods: This pilot study included 46 ABI patients: aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 22), ischemic stroke (n = 16), and traumatic brain injury (n = 8), along with three healthy controls. Urine samples were collected at early (1.50 ± 0.70 days) and late (9.17 ± 3.40 days) periods post-admission. UCH-L1 and creatinine levels were quantified using ELISA. UCH-L1 concentrations were compared to functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and dichotomized into favorable (mRS 0–3) and unfavorable (mRS 4–6) groups. Non-parametric statistical tests and ROC analysis was performed. Results: UCH-L1 concentrations in healthy controls were significantly lower compared to both early and late samples after ABI (p ≤ 0.001). The diagnostic performance of urine UCH-L1 at early timepoint showed excellent discriminatory ability, with AUC of 97.6% (95% CI: 93.0–100, p = 0.006 (sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%). Urine UCH-L1 concentrations, both with and without creatinine normalization, did not distinguish between favorable and unfavorable outcomes in either early (p = 0.88 and p = 0.36) or late samples (p = 0.98 and p = 0.30) in any types of ABI. Discussion and conclusions: Although UCH-L1 concentrations in urine did not differentiate between favorable and unfavorable outcomes, a significant difference was observed between healthy subjects and ABI patients. This finding underscores the significant diagnostic utility of urine UCH-L1 concentrations, regardless of the type of acute brain injury.

Keywords