Frontiers in Medicine (Dec 2021)

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Patients With Clinical Amyopathic Dermatomyositis: A Retrospective Study of 64 Patients at a Tertiary Dermatology Department

  • Keyun Tang,
  • Hanlin Zhang,
  • Hongzhong Jin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.783416
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Background: Clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) represents a subtype of 5–20% of patients with dermatomyositis (DM), which can be categorized into amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) and hypomyopathic dermatomyositis (HDM). The characteristics of patients with CADM are still limited in English literature.Objective: To investigate clinical features, cutaneous findings, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment regimen of CADM patients.Methods: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with CADM at Peking Union Medical College Hospital by dermatologists were retrospectively analyzed. Data were recorded in the electronic database at each offline clinical consultation and directly extracted from medical records. 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) classification was used to identify and classify patients with CADM. Published studies were searched to extract relevant data of CADM patients.Results: This cohort included 38 ADM patients and 26 HDM patients. 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria classified 67.2% of patients with CADM into probable or definite DM. Antimalarials were given to a majority of CADM patients (72.6%, n = 45). However, 68.8% (31 out of 45) required at least one aggressive agent combined with hydroxychloroquine due to insufficient response or side effects. The median of systemic treatments in HDM was significantly higher than ADM (p = 0.007). The number of ADM patients using antimalarials as monotherapy was significantly higher than that of HDM patients (p = 0.031), while the number of HDM patients receiving steroids combined with immunosuppressants was significantly higher (p = 0.025). The median of Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) score improvement was 11.5 and 10.5 for ADM and HDM after a median follow-up of 31.5 and 32.5 months, respectively. Six patients with normal muscle strength developed muscle weakness after a median of 10.5 months (IQR 9-13), and elevated inflammatory markers at initial visit might indicate their muscle weakness development.Conclusions: 32.8% of patients may be overlooked using the three skin variables of 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria. The response rate to single hydroxychloroquine in our cohort was 68.8%. Detailed treatment modalities were different among ADM and HDM. Long-term monitoring for the development of myositis in patients with CADM, especially those with elevated inflammatory markers at initial visit, may be warranted.

Keywords