BMC Genomics (Sep 2017)

Tissue-specific DNA methylation is conserved across human, mouse, and rat, and driven by primary sequence conservation

  • Jia Zhou,
  • Renee L. Sears,
  • Xiaoyun Xing,
  • Bo Zhang,
  • Daofeng Li,
  • Nicole B. Rockweiler,
  • Hyo Sik Jang,
  • Mayank N.K. Choudhary,
  • Hyung Joo Lee,
  • Rebecca F. Lowdon,
  • Jason Arand,
  • Brianne Tabers,
  • C. Charles Gu,
  • Theodore J. Cicero,
  • Ting Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4115-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 17

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Uncovering mechanisms of epigenome evolution is an essential step towards understanding the evolution of different cellular phenotypes. While studies have confirmed DNA methylation as a conserved epigenetic mechanism in mammalian development, little is known about the conservation of tissue-specific genome-wide DNA methylation patterns. Results Using a comparative epigenomics approach, we identified and compared the tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns of rat against those of mouse and human across three shared tissue types. We confirmed that tissue-specific differentially methylated regions are strongly associated with tissue-specific regulatory elements. Comparisons between species revealed that at a minimum 11-37% of tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns are conserved, a phenomenon that we define as epigenetic conservation. Conserved DNA methylation is accompanied by conservation of other epigenetic marks including histone modifications. Although a significant amount of locus-specific methylation is epigenetically conserved, the majority of tissue-specific DNA methylation is not conserved across the species and tissue types that we investigated. Examination of the genetic underpinning of epigenetic conservation suggests that primary sequence conservation is a driving force behind epigenetic conservation. In contrast, evolutionary dynamics of tissue-specific DNA methylation are best explained by the maintenance or turnover of binding sites for important transcription factors. Conclusions Our study extends the limited literature of comparative epigenomics and suggests a new paradigm for epigenetic conservation without genetic conservation through analysis of transcription factor binding sites.

Keywords