Meralgia Paresthetica: Neurolysis or Neurectomy?

Abstract

Meralgia paresthetica is a compressive neuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Surgery is the gold standard for severe cases. However, no high-quality evidence exists on which strategy is best: decompression or neurectomy. Data of a consecutive series of 52 patients treated for meralgia paresthetica over 25 years (1997–2022) were retrospectively collected from medical records and telephone interviews. In total, 27 women and 25 men were operated on; 11 patients had iatrogenic meralgia paresthetica. Decompression was performed on 47 patients, and neurectomy in 8 cases (5 primary neurectomies plus 3 failed neurolysis). Out of the patients who underwent decompression, 41 (87.2%) benefited from the treatment; 3 had pain relief, but no benefit on paresthesia; and 3 reported pain persistence. The latter required neurectomy to resolve symptoms. The eight patients who underwent neurectomy experienced symptom relief but had an obvious anesthetic area persisting over years. Complications were rare (3.8%): a groin hematoma in the post-operative course and an inguinal herniation 6 months after surgery. Surgery, be it neurolysis or neurectomy, offers excellent results with low risks. Decompression has been proven to be adequate in almost all patients, avoiding the side effects of neurectomy. The latter should be confined to failed decompression or to iatrogenic meralgia.

Keywords

• meralgia paresthetica
• peripheral neuropathy
• thigh pain
• neurolysis
• neurectomy