Reaching the Diagnosis of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Diabetes Mellitus in Different Clinical Scenarios: A Real-World Application of Updated Diagnostic Criteria
Anna Angelousi,
Dimitrios C. Ziogas,
Vasiliki Siampanopoulou,
Chrysoula Mytareli,
Amalia Anastasopoulou,
George Lyrarakis,
Helen Gogas
Affiliations
Anna Angelousi
First Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, Laikon Hospital, Center of Excellence of Endocrine Tumours (ERN), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
Dimitrios C. Ziogas
First Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
Vasiliki Siampanopoulou
First Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, Laikon Hospital, Center of Excellence of Endocrine Tumours (ERN), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
Chrysoula Mytareli
First Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, Laikon Hospital, Center of Excellence of Endocrine Tumours (ERN), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
Amalia Anastasopoulou
First Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
George Lyrarakis
First Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
Helen Gogas
First Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
Background: Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-associated diabetes mellitus (CPI-DM) is a rare immune-related adverse event (irAE) that presents with variable clinical manifestations. Data about its pathogenesis have not yet been adequately studied. Methods: Applying the recently updated diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all CPI-treated patients referred to our endocrinological unit for managing their endocrine irAEs and analyzed the incidence of CPI-DM, its clinical characteristics, and its management. Results: Among the 326 CPI-treated patients with endocrine irAEs, 4 patients met the updated criteria for the diagnosis of CPI-DM, representing 1.22% of all endocrine irAEs in our cohort. These four patients presented with distinct clinical scenarios regarding the irAE onset, the underlying malignancy, the administered CPI regimen, and the type of circulating autoantibodies. Conclusion: The variable presentation of CPI-DM and the non-standard sensitivity of the presence of the type 1 DM traditional autoantibodies highlight the need for distinct guidelines and increased awareness of its diagnosis and management.