Health Sciences Review (Dec 2022)

Pilates and improvement of balance and posture in older adults: A meta-analysis with focus on potential moderators

  • Jeferson Silva da Rocha,
  • Roberto Poton,
  • Lorena Rosa,
  • Nádia Lima da Silva,
  • Paulo Farinatti

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5
p. 100054

Abstract

Read online

Objective: The moderators of Pilates training on balance and posture in older individuals are unclear. We investigated through meta-analysis the effectiveness of Pilates to improve the balance and posture of older individuals and examine potential moderators of those effects. Methods: Electronic databases were searched by multiple reviewers until September 30th, 2021 to locate articles published in English, Spanish or Portuguese. Qualifying trials included adults aged ≥60 y and measured static/dynamic balance or posture pre-post intervention. Data on study design, sample characteristics, and features of Pilates interventions were tested as moderators of balance and posture outcomes. Results: Twenty-seven trials included 1,017 individuals (69.2 ± 4.7 y). Overall, sessions of 58.2 ± 8.6 min were performed 2.1 ± 0.5 d/wk for 12.3 ± 9.7 wk. Information on loads was often imprecise. The effect sizes (ES) in controlled vs. uncontrolled trials were: static balance (k = 13, ES 0.270, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.182–0.358 vs. k = 4, ES 0.284, CI 0.155–0.413); dynamic balance (k = 14, ES 0.714, CI 0.428–1.000 vs. k = 4, ES 0.648, CI (-0.008–1.303); posture (k = 2; ES 0.311, CI -0.106–0.729 vs. k = 5, ES 0.349, CI 0.240–0.458). Trials with lower methodological quality as reflected by the median of TESTEX inventory produced greater ES for dynamic balance (ES 0.928 vs. 0.523; p < 0.05). Greater training volumes (duration x number of sessions) increased ES of dynamic balance (ES 0.743 vs. 0.715) and posture (ES 0.422 vs. 0.176), the opposite occurring for static balance (ES 0.237 vs. 0.405) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Pilates seems to improve static and dynamic balance in older adults, while data on posture are less convincing. Poor study quality may overestimate the effects on dynamic balance. Greater training volumes appear to favor improvements in dynamic balance and posture.

Keywords