Elucidating the association between regional variation in diagnostic frequency with risk-adjusted mortality through analysis of claims data of medicare inpatients: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Objective The validity of risk-adjustment methods based on administrative data has been questioned because hospital referral regions with higher diagnosis frequencies report lower case-fatality rates, implying that diagnoses do not track the underlying health risk. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that regional variation of diagnostic frequency in inpatient records is not associated with different coding practices but a reflection of the underlying health risks.Design We applied two stratification methods to Medicare Analysis and Provider Review data from 2009 through 2014: (1) the number of chronic conditions; and, (2) quartiles of Risk Stratification Index (RSI)-defined risk. After sorting hospital referral regions into quintiles of diagnostic frequency, we examined all-cause mortality.Setting Medicare Analysis and Provider Review administrative database.Participants 18 126 301 hospitalised Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 or older who had at least one hospital-based procedure between 2009 and 2014.Exposure Coding frequency and baseline regional population risk factors by hospital referral region.Primary and secondary outcome(s) and measure(s) One year all-cause mortality in patients having the same number of chronic conditions or within the same RSI score quartile across US health referral regions, grouped by diagnostic frequency.Results No consistent relationship between diagnostic frequency and mortality in the risk stratum defined by number of chronic conditions was detected. In the strata defined by RSI quartile, there was no decrease in mortality as a function of diagnostic frequency. Instead, adjusted mortality was positively correlated with socioeconomic risk factors.Conclusions Using present-on-admission codes only, diagnostic frequency among inpatients with at least one hospital-based procedure appears to be consequent to differences in baseline population health status, rather than diagnostic coding practices. In this population, claims-based risk-adjustment using RSI appears to be useful for assessing hospital outcomes and performance.